Adam Cap

  • About
  • Mail
  • Archive/Search

Archives for October 2009

Kinetics Analysis of Tyrosinase

↘︎ Oct 28, 2009 … 6′ … download⇠ | skip ⇢

Introduction

Tyrosinase is an enzyme involved with that catalysis of monophenols and catechols. Specifically in mammals, tyrosinase catalyzes two steps in the biosynthesis of melanin pigments from tyrosine. The pigment produced from this reaction is used in eyes, hair, and skin. In this laboratory experiment, the kinetics of mushroom tyrosinase is observed by monitoring the oxidation of L and D-3,4-dihydroxyphenyl alanine (Dopa). A crimson colored complex forms from due in part to the oxidoreductase and copper containing functionality of the tyrosinase. The KM and Vmax for tyrosinase can be calculated from resulting data obtained by monitoring the kinetics of the tyrosinase-DOPA solution with a UV-vis spectrophotometer. The enzymatic activity of tyrosinase can then be inhibited and followed via inhibitors such as thiourea and cinnamic acid.

Experimental

During the first week of the experiment, the enzyme kinetics of tyrosine in the presence of L-Dopa and D-Dopa were observed using a UV-vis spectrophotometer at 475 nm. To begin, six solutions were prepared using varying amounts of phosphate buffer and L-Dopa, but an unwavering amount of tyrosinase. The buffer-L-Dopa solutions were prepared in 1 mL cuvettes, and the tyrosinase, kept on ice, was added immediately before subjecting the solutions to UV-vis spectrophotometry. The cuvettes were inverted using paraffin as a cover, in order to mix the enzyme and substrate together, and thus begin the reactions, which was of kinetic interest. The UV-vis was used to monitor the kinetics for one minute. The recorded data could then used to determine the KM and Vmax of tyrosinase. This procedure was then repeated, only using D-Dopa in lieu of L-Dopa.

During the second week of the experiment, the enzyme kinetics of tyrosinase were observed in the presence of L-DOPA and the inhibitors thiourea and cinnamic acid, and were again monitored using a UV-vis spectrophotometer. As in the aforementioned procedure used during the first week of the experiment, the enzyme kinetics of tyrosinase in the presence of varying amounts of L-Dopa and phosphate buffer was monitored using a UV-vis spectrophotometer. For the next two trials, varying amounts of inhibitor was added along with the L-Dopa and phosphate buffer. The inhibitors used were thiourea and trans-cinnamic acid. Again, the enzyme kinetics were followed using a UV-vis spectrophotometer and by comparing the Michaelis-Menten and Lineweaver-Burk plots of the trial without inhibitor to the trials with inhibitor, it could be deciphered as to what class of inhibitors were being dealt with.

Data

L-Dopa Week 1

Sample Velocity (A/min) Velocity (umol/min) Substrate Concentration (uM) 1/V 1/[S]

1

0.1495

0.041527778

228.2062985

24.08026756

0.004382

2

0.2807

0.077972222

532.4813632

12.82508016

0.001878

3

0.329

0.091388889

988.8939601

10.94224924

0.001011231

4

0.3854

0.107055556

2053.856686

9.340944473

0.000486889

5

0.3518

0.097722222

2510.269283

10.23308698

0.000398364

KM = 479.0208
Vmax = 0.1321

D-Dopa Week 1

Sample Velocity (A/min) Velocity (umol/min) Substrate Concentration (uM) 1/V 1/[S]

1

0.0564

0.015666667

228.2062985

63.82978723

0.004382

2

0.1744

0.048444444

532.4813632

20.64220183

0.001878

3

0.2248

0.062444444

988.8939601

16.01423488

0.001011231

4

0.3326

0.092388889

2053.856686

10.82381239

0.000486889

5

0.3843

0.10675

2510.269283

9.367681499

0.000398364

KM = 6616.7
Vmax = 0.4886

L-Dopa Week 2

Sample Velocity (A/min) Velocity (umol/min) Substrate Concentration (uM) 1/V 1/[S]

1

0.1708

0.047444444

228.2062985

21.07728337

0.004382

2

0.2729

0.075805556

532.4813632

13.19164529

0.001878

3

0.3596

0.099888889

988.8939601

10.01112347

0.001011231

4

0.4357

0.121027778

2053.856686

8.262565986

0.000486889

5

0.4662

0.1295

2510.269283

7.722007722

0.000398364

6

0.5055

0.140416667

4183.782139

7.121661721

0.000239018

KM = 512.77
Vmax = 0.1529

Thiourea

Sample Velocity (A/min) Velocity (umol/min) Substrate Concentration (uM) 1/V 1/[S] [I] (uM)

1

0.1871

0.051972222

228.2062985

19.24104757

0.004382

19.7057278

2

0.2926

0.081277778

532.4813632

12.30348599

0.001878

39.4114556

3

0.3332

0.092555556

988.8939601

10.80432173

0.001011231

197.057278

4

0.3548

0.098555556

2053.856686

10.14656144

0.000486889

394.114556

* Samples 5 and 6 discounted

KM = 283.6
Vmax = 0.1181

Trans-Cinnamic Acid

Sample Velocity (A/min) Velocity (umol/min) Substrate Concentration (uM) 1/V 1/[S] [I] (uM)

1

0.1871

0.051972222

228.2062985

19.24104757

0.004382

16.87365011

2

0.2926

0.081277778

532.4813632

12.30348599

0.001878

33.74730022

4

0.3548

0.098555556

988.8939601

10.14656144

0.000486889

337.4730022

* Samples 3, 5, and 6 discounted

KM = 279.8
Vmax = 0.1172

Results

In order to find the KM and Vmax, the raw data was first graphed as absorbance versus time. The slopes elicited from the linear regression of these plots were representative of velocity in terms of A/min. These velocities were then converted to umol/min using the equation A = Elc. Absorbance was divided by 3600 M-1 cm-1 and multiplied by 1 cm to give M/min, which was then converted to moles/min by multiplying by 0.001 L, the volume of the cuvette, and finally this value was converted to umol/min by multiplying by 106 umol/mol.

The concentration of the substrates was found by taking the known mg/mL concentration, dividing by the formula weight of the molecule to obtain mol/L, then multiplying by 106 umol/mol to obtain units in uM. These values were then multiplied by the percentage they comprised of the mL solution. The reciprocal values were graphed, 1/V versus 1/[S], with the y-intercept being equal to 1/Vmax and the x-intercept being equal to -1/KM.

As far as the results go, the KM and Vmax for L-Dopa are both significantly lower than that of D-Dopa found during the first week. This shows that tyrosinase exhibits stereoselectivity, otherwise the values would be exactly the same. It should have been expected that L-Dopa would have a higher KM and Vmax than that of D-Dopa however, because the naturally occurring Dopa molecule has L configuration. It seems more likely that the naturally occurring molecule would have fast enzyme kinetics than the synthesized molecule.

In regards to the inhibitors, the produced strikingly similar KM and Vmax values, both of which are lower than that of the reaction without either inhibitor. This suggests that both thiourea and cinnamic acid are uncompetitive inhibitors. The Vmax values for the runs with the inhibitors is around 0.12 for each, which is fairly close to that of the run without inhibitor, 0.15, but because the KM values for the inhibitor runs are nearly half that of the K­M for the trial without inhibitor, I am not sure how to decipher that. Having equal Vmax values could potentially make the inhibitors competitive, but the KM values should be greater, not lower, than that of the enzyme kinetics without inhibitor.

Conclusion

There is undoubtedly some error in the raw data which affected the KM and Vmax values for all the trials. I had to cut out a lot of data points in order to obtain linear regression lines with reasonable R2 values for the original absorbance versus time graphs, the slope of which was the velocity of the reaction. Even then, I still had to cut out more points for the Michaelis-Menten and Lineweaver-Burk plots in order to have reasonable looking graphs and values. Because the KM and Vmax values are not as expected, I would have to say the results are inconclusive. The inhibitors had nearly identical KM and Vmax values and had to be classified as uncompetitive. I would have expected the inhibitors to be competitive or noncompetitive, just because for a laboratory experiment I doubt the professor would have us analyze an uncompetitive inhibitor; it does not show much significance. The KM and Vmax for L-Dopa compared to D-Dopa from week one also seem odd; I would have expected L-Dopa to have the higher enzymatic activity.

I am guessing most of the error came from not being able to keep the solutions cold. There was a lot of waiting around in order to use the UV-vis spectrophotometer, and once the solutions of buffer and L-dopa were concocted, there was no real way to keep them chilled. This is probably what interfered with the ability to obtain valid data. It was also somewhat difficult to add the tyrosinase to each cuvette at the very same time, as for some solutions the droplet would gravitate down into the solution before the rest, so this cause error in the UV-vis spectrophotometer readings as well.

Questions

Question 1

Sodium azide – NaN3

Non-competitive inhibitor because of its ability to bind to copper.

 

Sodium cyanide – NaCN

Non-competitive inhibitor because of its ability to bind to copper.

 

L-phenylalanine – HO2CCH(NH2)CH2C6H5

Competitive inhibitor because of its inability to bind to copper.

 

8-hydroxyquinoline – C9H7NO

Competitive inhibitor because of its inability to bind to copper.

 

Tryptophan – C11H12N2O2

Competitive inhibitor because of its inability to bind to copper.

 

Diethyldithiocarbamate – S2CN(C2H5)2–

Non-competitive inhibitor because of its ability to bind to copper.

 

Cysteine – HO2CCH(NH2)CH2SH

Non-competitive inhibitor because of its ability to bind to copper.

 

Thiourea – CH4N2S

Non-competitive inhibitor because of its ability to bind to copper.

 

4-chlororesorcinol – C6H3(OH)2Cl

Competitive inhibitor because of its inability to bind to copper.

 

Phenylacetate – CH3COOC6H5

Competitive inhibitor because of its inability to bind to copper.

 

Question 2

a. Increase

b. Decrease

c. Decrease

d. Increase

e. Increase

f. No change

Me

circa 1996 (9 y/o)

about adam

Jump…

  • 09 Oct 28: Kinetics Analysis of Tyrosinase #CHM 2612 (Biochemistry Lab) #Dr. Mark F. Reynolds #Saint Joseph's University
  • 09 Oct 25: Determining the Relationship Between Work and Energy #Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo #Saint Joseph's University
  • 09 Oct 22: A Stable Neutral Diborene Containing a B=B Double Bond #CHM 2511 (Inorganic Chemistry) #Dr. Peter M. Graham #Saint Joseph's University
  • 09 Oct 2: Verifying Newton’s Second Law #Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo #PHY 1032 (General Physics Lab I) #Saint Joseph's University

More from…
CHM 2612 (Biochemistry Lab) (Class) / Dr. Mark F. Reynolds (Teacher) / Saint Joseph’s University (School) / schoolwork (Post Type)

Determining the Relationship Between Work and Energy

↘︎ Oct 25, 2009 … 3′ … download⇠ | skip ⇢

Purpose

To determine the relationship between force, displacement, potential energy, kinetic energy, and work by using a force sensor to pull a spring and also to push a cart.

Hypothesis

The work done on the spring will be greatest at its furthest displacement and that the greater the work done on the cart, the greater its acceleration will be.

Labeled Diagrams

See attached sheet.

Data

Part One

Time (s) Position (m)
Start Pulling 0 0
Stop Pulling 5 0.23
Spring Constant (N/m) 81.668

Stretch

7 cm 14 cm Maximum (23 cm)
Integral (during pull) (J) 0.1779 0.8080 2.152
∆PE (J) 0.20 0.80 2.16

Part Two

Weight of cart: 5.29 N

Mass of cart: 0.54 kg

Time (s) Position (m)
Start Pushing 0.46 0.0
Stop Pushing 0.82 0.065
Mass (kg) 0.54
Final Velocity (m/s) 0.3149
Integral during push (J) 0.04796
∆KE of cart (J) 0.027

Graphs

See attached sheets.

Questions

1. In Part 1 you did work to stretch the spring. The graph of force vs. distance depends on the particular spring you used, but for most springs will be a straight line. This corresponds to Hooke’s law, of F=-kx, where F is the force applied by the spring when it is stretched a distance x. k is the spring constant, measured in N/m. What is the spring constant of the spring? From your graph, does the spring follow Hooke’s law? Do you think that it would always follow Hooke’s law, no matter how far you stretched it? Why is the slope of your graph positive, while Hooke’s law has a minus sign?

The spring constant is 81.668 N/m. From the graph, it does appear that the spring follows Hooke’s law as it produced a fairly straight line. I think the spring would follow Hooke’s law until it is all the way stretched out and cannot be stretched any more, or if breaks. The slope of the graph is positive as it is showing force applied on the spring. Hooke’s law shows the force applied by the spring, so that would be in the opposite direction in which it is pulled, thus being negative.

2. The elastic potential energy stored by a spring is given by ∆PE = ½ kx2, where x is the distance. Compare the work you measured to stretch the spring to 10 cm, 20 cm, and the maximum stretch to the stored potential energy predicted by this expression. Should they be similar?

The ∆PE for my intervals was 0.20 J at 7 cm, 0.80 J at 14 cm, and 2.16 J at 23 cm. The ∆PE increased as the displacement is increased. This should be expected, as the spring becomes harder to pull the more it is stretched out.

3. In Part 2 you did work to accelerate the cart. In this case the work went to changing the kinetic energy. Since no spring was involved and the cart moved along a level surface, there is no change in potential energy. How does the work you did compare to the change in kinetic energy. Here, since the initial velocity is zero, ∆KE = ½ mv2 where m is the total mass of the cart and any added weights, and v is the final velocity. Record you values in the data table.

The work done, 0.04796 J, is greater than the ∆KE, which is 0.027 J.

Conclusion

Lab Summarized

The overall goal of the lab was to investigate the relationship between work, potential energy, and kinetic energy. The goal was achieved using a spring and force sensor along with a motion detector to determine the work done on the spring when pulling it. Using the motion detector, displacement was determined, which could then be used to determine the spring constant from Hooke’s law. The force and acceleration were also collected using the force sensor and motion detector. Graphs produced of force versus position could be integrated to find the work done on the spring over certain intervals. The slope of the linear fit of this graph could also be used to produce the spring constant. Finally, the elastic potential energy stored in the spring could be determined from the aforementioned data.

During the second part of the experiment, the force sensor was used to push and thus accelerate a cart on the frictionless track toward a motion detector. The measured weight of the cart and final velocity could then be used to determine the change in kinetic energy of the cart. The work applied could again be determined by taking an integral over the time period in which the cart was pushed and accelerated with the force sensor.

The data collected for part one seems fairly conclusive. The determined spring constant of 81.668 N/m is comparable to known spring constants. The values for work extrapolated by integrating the graphs of force versus position are extremely close to the calculated values for work, or potential energy. The values of 0.1779 and 0.20 J, 0.8080 and 0.80 J, and 2.152 and 2.16 J are nearly identical, which shows part one of the experiment was performed rather well (or luckily). In regards to part two of the experiment, the work done on the cart found by integrating the graph of force versus position, 0.04796 J, is almost twice as large as the calculated change in kinetic energy, 0.027 J. The only way that this could be accounted for is if the wrong interval was used for the integral on the graph. Looking at the graph, it seems like the integral taken should have been from the start to the top of the peak, and not the whole peak.

Equations

W = F * s

W = ∆PE + ∆KE

∆PE = ½ kx2

∆KE = ½ mv2

F = -kx

Me

circa 2017 (29 y/o)

Popularly…

  • 04 Mar 25: Creon as a Tragic Character in “Antigone” #10th Grade – English – Forms of Fiction #Great Valley High School #Mr. Thomas Esterly
  • 06 Sep 25: Determining the Density of an Unknown Substance (Lab Report) #CHM 1112 (General Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Joseph N. Bartlett #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 07 Sep 26: Recrystallization and Melting Point Determination Lab #CHM 2312 (Organic Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Roger K. Murray #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 07 Oct 17: Acid/Base Extraction of a Benzoic Acid, 4-Nitroaniline, and Naphthalene Mixture #CHM 2312 (Organic Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Roger K. Murray #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 09 Oct 2: Verifying Newton’s Second Law #Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo #PHY 1032 (General Physics Lab I) #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 10 Mar 2: Electrical Resistance and Ohm’s Law #Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo #PHY 1042 (General Physics Lab II) #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 05 Mar 28: The American Dream Essay #11th Grade – English – American Literature #Great Valley High School #Mrs. Michelle Leininger
  • 04 Nov 27: The Crucible Essay on the Theme of Having a Good Name #11th Grade – English – American Literature #Great Valley High School #Mrs. Michelle Leininger
  • 08 Apr 6: The Portrayal of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in “As Good as It Gets” #PSY 1151 (Psychology of Abnormal Behavior) #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 07 Nov 7: Liquids #CHM 2312 (Organic Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Roger K. Murray #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 06 Oct 2: Yeast Lab #BIO 1011 (Biology I: Cells) #Dr. Denise Marie Ratterman #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 07 Feb 21: Determining an Equilibrium Constant Using Spectrophotometry #CHM 1122 (General Chemistry Lab II) #Mr. John Longo #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 07 Nov 14: Thin-Layer Chromatography #CHM 2312 (Organic Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Roger K. Murray #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 06 Nov 20: The Effect Light Intensity Has on the Photosynthesis of Spinach Chloroplasts #BIO 1011 (Biology I: Cells) #Dr. Denise Marie Ratterman #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 06 Nov 14: Enthalpy of Hydration Between MgSO4 and MgSO4 ∙ 7 H2O #CHM 1112 (General Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Joseph N. Bartlett #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 04 Oct 3: Catcher in the Rye Essay on the Immaturity of Holden Caufield #11th Grade – English – American Literature #Great Valley High School #Mrs. Michelle Leininger
  • 10 Mar 22: Series and Parallel Circuits Lab #Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo #PHY 1042 (General Physics Lab II) #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 07 Feb 14: Determining the Rate Law for the Crystal Violet-Hydroxide Ion Reaction #CHM 1122 (General Chemistry Lab II) #Mr. John Longo #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 10 Feb 22: Hooke’s Law and Simple Harmonic Motion #Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo #PHY 1042 (General Physics Lab II) #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 07 Feb 7: The Reactivity of Magnesium Metal with Hydrochloric Acid #CHM 1122 (General Chemistry Lab II) #Mr. John Longo #Saint Joseph’s University

More from…
Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo (Teacher) / Saint Joseph’s University (School) / schoolwork (Post Type)

A Stable Neutral Diborene Containing a B=B Double Bond

↘︎ Oct 22, 2009 … 2′ … download⇠ | skip ⇢

Unlike the well know and oft studied chemistry of double bonds between carbons, the chemistry of boron-boron double bonds is for the most part unexplored. It is believed that boron should behave similarly to carbon due to its relativity to the element on the periodic table. Anions containing boron double bonds, specifically [R2BBR­­2]2-, have in the past been predicted to be possible structures of interest to synthesize in the laboratory, however such efforts have failed for the most part.

It was then proposed to explore neutral diborenes, even though they in theory should be highly reactive compounds due to their triplet ground states and two one-electron π-bonds according to molecular orbital theory. The electron deficiency in this structure could however be stabilized by the addition of Lewis base ligands. The stabilizing ability of different ligand groups were assessed, including CO and NHC, which were chosen based on their strong electron donating capabilities. The ligand group that ultimately experimentally produced an actual neutral diborene was :C{N(2,6-PRi2C6H3)CH}2. Previous work from using this ligand group for stabilizing carbenes suggested that this would be a potential stabilizing ligand for a diborene.

This compound, R(H)B=B(H)R, where R is the aforementioned ligand group, was synthesized beginning with RBBr3 and KC8 in diethyl ether. Two products were isolated from this reaction, including the desired diborene R(H)B=B(H)R. It was shown that a ratio of 1:5.4 of RBBr3 to KC8 yielded the highest percentage of R(H)B=B(H)R (12%). Any excess amount of RBBr3 over this ratio resulted in a decrease of R(H)B=B(H)R and thus in increase of the other product, R(H)2B-B(H)2R.

A few methods were utilized in order to determine the chemical makeup of these products. NMR resonances of RBH3, R(H)2B-B(H)2R, and R(H)B=B(H)R were respectively reported to be -35.38, -31.62, and +25.30 ppm. The 11B signal of R(H)B=B(H)R produced a quartet, while the other two compounds elicited singlets. This alone could suggest double bond character between borons.

X-ray structural analysis shows a bond distance of 1.828 Å for R(H)2B-B(H)2R. This number seems to be on point with calculated B-B bond lengths for similar structures such as the CO-ligated analogue (1.819 Å) and an activated m-terphenyl based diborate (1.83 Å). Crystallization of R(H)B=B(H)R reveals B-C bond distances of 1.547 Å, which is marginally shorter than that of the other molecules. In addition to this, it is calculated that the angles between the C3N2 carbene rings and the core are strikingly different than that of the other compounds used and produced. Finally, the B=B bond distance in R(H)B=B(H)R was measured to be much shorter than the B-B distance reported in R(H)2B-B(H)2R, again implying a double bond.

DFT computations were also used to support the nature of R(H)B=B(H)R. The analysis was performed on the simplified model, where R=:C(NHCH)2­. The experimental bond lengths for the non-simplified model seem to be in concordance with the computed B-B and B-C bond lengths, and well as the B-B-C bond angle calculated from the simplified model analyzed using DFT. The bond character of these bonds was also delved into via HOMO representations of the compounds among other computational techniques.

In conclusion, the authors of the paper were able to successfully prove that they had synthesized and characterized the first neutral diborene compound. They also ventured into the nature of the elusive boron-boron double bond. Though it was not necessarily expected that this phenomenon could feasibly be synthesized due to the expected reactivity of the boron-boron double bond, these chemists found a way to isolate the compound. In context to the larger field of chemistry, I suppose that the authors could determine other possible ligand groups that would produce a stable neutral diborene. They could also venture into increasing the percent yield, as 12% is on the low side. Finally, they could explore other group 13 elements, such as Al and Ga to see if they can replicate similar double bond properties.

Me

circa 2008 (20 y/o)

Randomly…

  • 07 Apr 4: Relating to Jimmy’s Destructive Tendencies in “The Dubliners” #ENG 1021 (Texts and Contexts) #Mrs. Marie H. Flocco #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 09 Nov 4: Bredt’s Rule PowerPoint Presentation #CHM 2351 (Advanced Organic Chemistry) #Dr. Mark A. Forman #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 06 Apr 19: Personality Profile of N.K. #12th Grade – Psychology #Great Valley High School #Mr. Bill McNamara
  • 09 Oct 25: Determining the Relationship Between Work and Energy #Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 04 Feb 11: Of Mice and Men Essay #10th Grade – English – Forms of Fiction #Great Valley High School #Mr. Thomas Esterly
  • 07 Nov 29: Microwave-Assisted Organic Synthesis of a Diels-Alder Reaction #CHM 2312 (Organic Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Roger K. Murray #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 05 Oct 17: High School Resume #Great Valley High School
  • 97 Sep 27: Not Enough Candy #4th Grade #Ms. Ringle #Sugartown Elementary School
  • 07 Oct 17: Isolation Cholesterol from Gallstones via Extraction and Recrystallization #CHM 2312 (Organic Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Roger K. Murray #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 09 Mar 29: WHY SJU IS DA BOMB #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 98 Apr 13: The Birthday Cake Surprise #4th Grade #Ms. Ringle #Sugartown Elementary School
  • 08 Feb 17: Fischer Esterification #CHM 2322 (Organic Chemistry Lab II) #Dr. Mark A. Forman #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 06 May 1: Le Québec #12th Grade – AP French #Great Valley High School #Mrs. Patricia Carlini
  • 06 Oct 31: Using Volumetric Glassware to Measure, Dilute, and Titrate an Acid Solution #CHM 1112 (General Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Joseph N. Bartlett #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 10 Apr 22: Oxygenation and Hydrochlorination of Vaska’s Complex Ir(Cl)[P(C6H5)3]2(CO) #CHM 2521 (Inorganic Chemistry Lab) #Dr. Peter M. Graham #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 09 Oct 2: Verifying Newton’s Second Law #Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo #PHY 1032 (General Physics Lab I) #Saint Joseph’s University
  • 06 Apr 25: Krapf’s School Bus Scholarship Essay #Great Valley High School
  • 05 Nov 17: Racism as a Theme in “Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe” #12th Grade – English #Great Valley High School #Mr. Michael Settanni
  • 97 Oct 28: Note From Mom and Dad #4th Grade #Ms. Ringle #Sugartown Elementary School
  • 06 Sep 25: Determining the Density of an Unknown Substance (Lab Report) #CHM 1112 (General Chemistry Lab I) #Dr. Joseph N. Bartlett #Saint Joseph’s University

More from…
CHM 2511 (Inorganic Chemistry) (Class) / Dr. Peter M. Graham (Teacher) / Saint Joseph’s University (School) / schoolwork (Post Type)

Verifying Newton’s Second Law

↘︎ Oct 2, 2009 … 2′ … download⇠ | skip ⇢

Purpose

To determine the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration using a cart attached to a pulley with varying weights.

Hypothesis

If the mass of the weights attached to the pulley is increased, the force exerted on the cart and the acceleration of the cart will also increase.

Labeled Diagrams

See attached sheet.

Data

Weight of Cart and Sensor (N)

6.624

Weight of Cart System (kg)

0.6759

Weight of Pulley (g)

60

50

40

30

20

10

Force Exerted on Cart (N)

0.5472

0.4921

0.4059

0.3227

0.2321

0.1404

Average Acceleration of Cart (m/s^2)

0.8252

0.736

0.7222

0.4469

0.3395

0.2148

Weight of Cart and Sensor and 300 g (N)

9.718

Weight of Cart System (kg)

0.9916

Weight of Pulley (g)

60

50

40

30

20

10

Force Exerted on Cart (N)

0.588

0.5049

0.418

0.3323

0.2385

0.1442

Average Acceleration (m/s^2)

0.6655

0.5182

0.4263

0.3478

0.2633

0.1476

Graphs

See attached sheets.

Questions

1. Is the graph of force vs. acceleration for the cart a straight line? If so, what is the value of the slope?

Yes, the graph produces nearly a straight line; the correlation for a linear fit is 0.9787. The value of the slope is 0.6129 N/(m/s^2).

2. What are the units of the slope of force vs. acceleration graph? Simplify the units of the slope to fundamental units (m, kg, s). What does the slope represent?

The units of the slope of force vs. acceleration are N/(m/s^2). This simplifies to kg. The slope represents the mass of the pulley.

3. What is the total mass of the system (both with and without extra weight) that you measured?

The total mass of the system without the extra weight was 0.6759 kg and the mass of the system with the extra weight (300 g) was 0.9916 kg, which seems to make sense. 0.9916 kg is almost exactly 300 g more than 0.6759 kg.

4. How does the slope of your graph compare (percent difference) with the total mass of the system that you measured?

The slope of the graph without any added weights was 0.6129 kg, which is a 9.78% difference. The slope of the graph with the added weights was 0.8939 kg, which is a 10.36% difference.

5. Are the net force on an object and the acceleration of the object directly proportional?

Yes, as the net force is increased, the acceleration is also increased.

6. Write a general equation that relates all three variables: force, mass, and acceleration.

F = ma

Conclusion

Lab Summarized

The overall goal of the lab was to determine and show the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. The goal was achieved using a cart and pulley system with varying weights to measure force and acceleration. The forces and accelerations collected were then graphed against each other the construct a linear fit line, whose slope showed the mass of the system (the cart, sensor, and any added weights). This value could then be compared to the mass calculated from the force of the free hanging system. The force and acceleration from each trial run could also be analyzed to show any relationship between the two values.

The data collected seemed to show a direct correlation between force and acceleration. Thus, the stated hypothesis was confirmed that if the force was increased, the acceleration would also increase. The compared values for the masses of the cart systems were about 10% different in each case. For the trial without any added weight, the calculated value of 0.6759 kg is 9.78% different from the extrapolated value of 0.6129 kg. In regards to the trial with the added weight, the calculated value of 0.9916 kg is 10.36% different than the extrapolated value of 0.8939 kg. This error could have been caused by a number of factors. For instance, the air resistance from the weight on the pulley dropping could have caused error, and any possible friction from the track could have attributed to this, too. It could also be thought that if the pulley did not drop straight downward, i.e. it was swaying at all, this would have further error. Lastly, if the rope was not completely taught when the system was put in motion, that could have caused error as well.

Equations

F = ma

a = 9.8 m/s^2

N/(m/s^2) = kg

Me

circa 2009 (21 y/o)

More from…
Dr. Paul J. Angiolillo (Teacher) / PHY 1032 (General Physics Lab I) (Class) / Saint Joseph’s University (School) / schoolwork (Post Type)

  • Home
  • About
  • Archive
  • Mail
  • Random
  • Dingus
  • Reading
  • Code

ADAM CAP is an elastic waistband enthusiast, hammock admirer, and rare dingus collector hailing from Berwyn, Pennsylvania.

My main interests at this time include reading, walking, and learning how to do everything faster.

Psst: If you find my website helpful or enjoyable, please join my newsletter and/or send me an email—I want to hear from you!

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

© 2009–2025 Adam Cap(riola) top ⇡